Hardware Trust vs. Entity Trust: Complementary Attestation Models for Agent Commerce
As autonomous AI agents increasingly execute financial transactions on behalf of human delegators, the question of trust becomes bifurcated: can we trust the execution environment? and can we trust the executing entity? This paper argues that hardware-based trust (Trusted Execution Environments) and entity-based trust (behavioral verification scoring) are complementary, not competing, attestation models. We formalize a dual-attestation architecture that integrates TEE hardware proofs with Transaction Trust Scoring (TTS), demonstrating through a live production system that TEE attestation shifts optimal scoring weights by up to 64% on the compliance dimension while reducing entity verification weight by 27%.
TEEtrusted execution environmentIntel TDXIntel SGXentity trusttransaction trust scoreagent commercedual attestationDACPhardware trustTEE.Fail
Cite
Thomas Perry Jr.. "Hardware Trust vs. Entity Trust: Complementary Attestation Models for Agent Commerce." Pastoral Tech, 2026-02-20. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18718587. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18718587
BibTeX
@article{perry2026hardware,
author = {Perry, Thomas Jr.},
title = {Hardware Trust vs. Entity Trust: Complementary Attestation Models for Agent Commerce},
year = {2026},
month = {02},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.18718587},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18718587},
publisher = {Zenodo},
license = {CC-BY-4.0}
}